The Life of the Party
by Nebu Ganesh
Nebu Ganesh, PhD. East Coast Liberal Effete Intellectual |
Reince Priebus, Chairman of the RNC. "It all goes back to what our moms used to tell us; its not just what we say, its how we say it." If so, why did she name him Reince? I mean, how do you say it? |
The findings of the
Growth and Opportunity Project are as close as the Party have come to stepping outside of their philosophical comfort zone. Their rationale may be contrived to fit the Party mold, but the problems they identify are very real, and the report is a good
first step in recognizing the scope of the issue. Unfortunately their good efforts were overshadowed by Tea Party antics and the usual
offensive rhetoric offered as red meat to true believers at CPAC.
The major sponsors of CPAC. The G.O.P. report did not mention corporate influence on Republican Party policy. Many CPAC sponsors give money to centrist campaigns also. |
The G.O.P. report concludes that people of color have the
impression that they are not wanted under the big tent, and that the Republican
Party is composed of old, white, culturally insulated men. Conservative
candidates need to develop an ‘outreach’ to their new ‘demographic partners’,
aka people of color. It suggests the
creation of diversity awareness classes, termed ‘liberty classes’ to help politicians learn how to help people at the bottom of the economic ladder. And it reports that conservative attempts to
dismantle affirmative action laws are off-putting, especially while keeping
programs perceived as helping the ‘well off’.
Minorities also have a strong sense of ‘linked fate’ and therefore disagree
with G.O.P. pronouncements that President Obama is ‘lazy’ and take offense to terms like ‘self-deportation’, a gateway issue for
Hispanics. Young voters, it seems, have
an open acceptance of gay life styles and do not react well to anti-gay
rhetoric. And surprisingly, the report
warns that ‘king-making’ political PACs are corrupting political environments,
resulting in sub-standard candidates and an obstructionist electorate. The report also warns that the G.O.P. must
deal with ‘small but noisy elements’ that co-opt any message of inclusiveness
if it wants to win the ‘propaganda battle’ against the Democrats.
Wow. That is a lot of
truth for our poor conservative brothers to consider.
Meanwhile, the ‘small but noisy elements’ were waging their
own ‘propaganda battle’ in Maryland.
Equal time was devoted to the battle against both Liberals and the Republican Party. Popular centrist conservative politicians were
not invited. Although word went out that
Party policy would now favorably consider gay rights issues, Log Cabin Republicans and conservative
activist group GoProud were not included. 2013 CPAC attendees were the usual suspects, with this year’s
added feature of a proud vocal white supremacist spouting hatred in a seminar designed to heighten cultural awareness.
Situation normal, you might say. What's your point? Well, the
Growth and Opportunity Project was
immediately dubbed by both liberal and conservative press as the ‘Republican autopsy’,
with analysis termed as a ‘post-mortem’.
Autopsies are not performed on living entities. There is a common belief that the Republican
Party as we know it is dead, killed by a neo-conservative cancer. In fact there have been
two parties under the conservative umbrella for some time, the broad-spectrum
Republicans who think of themselves as a big tent, and the parasite Tea Party
coalition, non-conformists who refuse to cooperate but who use party resources
to forward their own agenda. Some experts believe
that the philosophical divide between them permeates so deeply into the grass roots that it is unsolvable.
In fact the Republican Party has altered its course several
times throughout history. In surprisingly similar circumstances opposing factions have
split off to become new entities. If the Party majority cannot control the ‘small but noisy element’, they must remove it. But there are a few problems. For one thing, there is an outstanding amount
of money being made in rabble-rousing, and it is dangerous to mess with a man’s
livelihood. A divorce will not be amicable. For another, an out and out
declaration of war within the party will almost certainly result in another
failed White House bid. But unless there is conciliatory reform within the Republican Party, history shows us that a split is inevitable. That, or the predicted death of the Party will come, necessitating a very real post-mortem.
No comments:
Post a Comment